A fresh look at the terminal in Port Rowan

A fellow hobbyist got in touch yesterday to ask if he could use an overall photo of my layout in a presentation he’s doing at a convention in his area – and I was happy to oblige. But I realized that I didn’t have a suitable, current photograph. So off to Port Rowan I went, to shoot a few options for him.

Those are now on the way to him via email, but since I haven’t shared photos of the layout in a while, I thought I’d post them here too.

This photo provides a nice overview of the terminal at Port Rowan. I’ve shot this vantage point before, but not since adding trees to both the left (backdrop) and right (fascia) sides of the yard:

Port Rowan overview

This is another shot I’ve taken before, looking along the turntable lead towards the yard entrance. I like it better now that I have those two large trees in place to the left of the track:

Port Rowan turntable

Here’s a photo of Port Rowan taken from across the aisle at St. Williams. It’s a good overview that emphasizes the spread-out nature of this small branchline terminal:

Port Rowan overview

This next photo is another shot I frequently take – looking up the line from end of track in Port Rowan, at track level. I’ve always liked this shot, but it’s even better with extra trees to frame the scene – including additional trees across the aisle in St. Williams:

Port Rowan - along the track

This final photo is probably the best one to illustrate how the layout fits into the room, but it’s also the weakest in terms of composition – in no small part because the end of the peninsula (closest to the camera) is so unfinished compared to the rest of the layout. The Lynn Valley is out of view to the upper right.

Port Rowan - from end of peninsula

Every so often, I need to photograph the layout to make a record of the progress that I’ve made on it. But I haven’t been doing that lately as other things have taken priority. So I’m grateful that I was approached about sharing some images – and flattered that someone would want to use my layout to illustrate a point in their clinic.

A visit from the Brothers Harper

Yesterday, I hosted Bob Harper, his brother Gerald Harper, and my friend David Woodhead for a layout visit. There are many interesting connections between us.

I first met Gerald when I hosted members of the Toronto Chapter of the Canadian Association of Railway Modellers for an open house back in April of last year. Gerald got in touch recently to let me know his brother Bob was coming to North America from the UK – and bringing his exhibition-style Maine two-foot layout with him. Could they come for a visit? Of course!

Naturally, Bob and I had a lot to talk about – from the mechanics of packing a layout for a plane voyage, to the paperwork required, to how he ended up modelling a Maine two-footer. (I know how that goes – I did it myself, before embarking on the Port Rowan project.)

After a tour of the layout, we retired to Harbord House for dinner. David could not join us, unfortunately, but he did take a few photos when Bob and Gerald were at my house:

Bob Harper at Port Rowan
(Bob inspects a freight extra about to leave Port Rowan)

Gerald Harper at Port Rowan
(Gerald snaps a photo of a CNR self-propelled unit, running on M233’s schedule)

Subsequent to the visit to my basement, Bob and Gerald took Bob’s layout – Franklin in On2 – to the annual Railroad Hobby Show in Springfield, Massachusetts. You can read more about that trip on the MaineOn2 FAQ website.

If you missed Franklin there, you have a couple more chances to see it on this side of The Pond: Bob and his layout will attend the annual Ontario Narrow Gauge Show in Schomberg, Ontario in April and the National Narrow Gauge Convention in Minneapolis, Minnesota in September.

Shooting a cover

The editor of a hobby magazine emailed yesterday to ask for a vertical-format photo to use as a potential cover for a feature I wrote. I spent the next several hours composing and shooting 13 potential covers.

Shooting a cover.
(Lights, camera, cover? We’ll see if this composition makes the cut…)

I’m pretty excited: If my photo is used, it’ll be the first cover story related to my current layout in a mainstream monthly print publication. (My previous, Maine On2 layout made the cover of RMC several times.)

Cover shots are tricky. First, the vertical format is really challenging for almost all layout photography. We normally view our models (and our layouts) from the side. But the vertical format for a cover means it makes more sense to shoot along the layout instead of across it.

As anyone who has done layout tour photography will know, that creates all sorts of challenges. For example, Even if you’re just focussing on a couple of models in the foreground – just a few feet in front of the camera – you may have an expanse of sky that’s going to need lighting. In the case of the above photo, I had to light up about 15 feet of backdrop in Port Rowan, plus the background at the west end of St. Williams – about 25 feet away from the lens.

Another issue is the nature of trains themselves. Our model trains are low (extending just a few inches above the rails) but long (running for several feet). So shooting a train side-on is impossible when taking a vertical format photograph. Even shooting even a single piece of equipment side-on is tricky. For a vertical photo, even if the model fills the frame side-to-side, there’s going to be a ton of boring sky above it.

This is another reason to build realistically tall trees. They help add interest to the photo. It helps, too, that on a cover, much of the top of any photo will be covered by the magazine’s name/logo. There will also be several call-outs on the cover – “Gluing things to other things: Page 48” and so on – that help hide less desirable elements in the background of a photo. In my case, I have a sharp vertical line where the backdrop curves away from Port Rowan to enter the Lynn Valley, but cloning some trees in PhotoShop, combined with the logo and call-outs, will make that disappear from the viewer’s perception.

The logo, the call-outs, and other items like the location of mailing labels and UPC codes are all things one needs to think about while composing a cover. And that’s before any considerations about scene composition and engagement with the casual viewer. A cover needs to grab attention on the rack – whether it’s in a hobby-friendly location like the local model train emporium, or in an agnostic location like a book shop or grocery store, where it’s competing not only with other model railroading publications, but also all those other magazines vying for our money.

I know my layout photographs well, because I’ve found many interesting places to shoot images on it (which I’ve shared on this blog). But I’ve rarely done vertical format photos and I was surprised at how difficult it was to find an interesting location to shoot when the camera was rotated 90 degrees.

We’ll see how well I did if/when my shot is used on the cover.

Beyond that, I will wait until the article comes out before I reveal what it’s about and what magazine it’s in. At that time, I’ll also share some of the rejected cover shots.

Stay tuned…

Open up!

CARM 2017 - Open House

I’ve been asked several times to open my layout for tours, and I rarely do. My layout is medium-sized but the layout room is fairly tight. Get more than a few people in the space and it gets uncomfortable. And since the layout is designed for walk-around control, with turnout and turntable controls mounted on the facia, it can also become impossible to operate if the aisles are plugged.

But Ian McIntosh from the Toronto Chapter of the Canadian Association of Railway Modellers has been asking me for many years now if I’d host a tour. (In fact, his first request was back when I was still modelling the Boston & Maine in HO scale.) And earlier this year, Ian suggested that he and his wife Joan – also involved with the local chapter – could schedule members into time slots, and keep the numbers to something that my layout could manage.

So, I said “Yes”, and I hosted about a dozen people on Saturday afternoon, divided into three 90-minute windows.

Normally, people who visit my layout have a good idea what to expect. Sometimes, they’ve known me for ages and I’ve already shared my work with them. Other times, they’re regular readers of this blog so they have a solid understanding of my layout and my approach to the hobby. Some of my guests this past weekend have read my blog. But for most, I think, it was a brand new experience.

There was a lot to experience, and I’m always interested in what ideas people take away from my layout.

Having had several visitors over the years since I started building Port Rowan in 1:64 in October of 2011, I know that some features are always popular:

The garden scale switch stands I use to control turnouts always generate a lot of discussion. So do the tools I’ve mounted on the fascia to help operators simulate setting brakes and pumping air.

Visitors always comment on my use of environmental audio – the birdsong and other noises that help place the viewer in the scene. My decision to light they layout with 12v Halogen landscape lighting is also often discussed.

I know my approach is a track less travelled. I’ve built a very simple layout in a rather generous space, giving it a relaxed feel that’s not often seen in the hobby. And of course it was a real temptation during the design phase to add more track or choose busier locations.

But I’m glad that I built the layout just the way I did. And it proved itself again on the weekend, as I was able to operate the layout – solo – for my visitors while still holding conversations and answering questions. At no time did I feel stressed by the experience.

I had a couple of DCC-related incidents – possibly caused by something touching on a locomotive and causing a short – but nothing that stopped the show. I’m investigating the issue and hope to have it resolved quickly. Also, I had just two derailments – not perfect, which is my goal, but both caused by (my) operator error so I’ll mark that up as a “win”.

And of course, there’s often a discussion around S scale. For many people, mine is the first layout they’ve seen built to S scale standard gauge. I had many conversations about how I ended up in S, and how I find it to be a sweet spot between the size of the models, and compatibility with a medium-sized space. For me, it really does combine the mass of O scale with HO’s ability to model the space around the tracks, too.

I never try to convince others to model in S: choice of scale is a personal decision, and what works for me won’t work for you. But I suspect a few people left with a new appreciation for 1:64.

(Thank you, Ian and Joan, for arranging the tour. And thanks to everyone who attended. I enjoyed sharing my layout with you!)

CARM 2017 - Open House

Roweham 2017

Roweham 2017
(The passenger train – an auto coach pushed by a 14XX class 0-4-2T – arrives at Roweham)

Those who have read this blog for some time now know that I’m a fan of smaller layouts. I’m far more impressed by a small, thoughtfully-conceived and expertly executed model railway than I am by a half-baked basement-filler. The hobby is not about quantity for me; it’s about quality. In fact, I have a whole other blog devoted to what I call Achievable Layouts.

So it’ll come as no surprise that last Saturday, I was delighted to help my friend Brian Dickey exhibit his 7mm (British O scale – 1:43) masterpiece, “Roweham”, at the annual model railway show organized by the club to which he belongs. Also on hand was my friend Pierre Oliver – who, like me, helped Brian exhibit Roweham at last year’s show. We were joined this year by Ross Oddi. (Great to meet you, Ross!)

Roweham 2017
(Ross, Pierre, and Brian on deck)

Roweham 2017
(Ross deploys Brian’s version of the Galvanick Lucipher to break the train as engineer Pierre prepares his next move. Brian’s layout uses prototypically-correct three-link couplings, which add to the play value)

For me, Brian has really hit all the targets with Roweham. The modelling is excellent, and careful. The design is realistic and relaxed – perfect for a branchline terminal in a Green and Pleasant Land. The locomotives and rolling stock are appropriate for the modelling subject, and run flawlessly. (We had one derailment during the show – the result of buffer lock between a longish 2-6-0 and a short wagon. Brian immediately removed the mogul from service so it would not detract from the presentation.) And the presentation is professional – from the skirting, to the fascia, to Brian’s handsome waistcoat complete with brass GWR buttons. (Since I’m part of the exhibition team, I’ll be happy to follow Brian’s lead and pick up a waistcoat from his supplier.)

Roweham 2017
(An overview of Roweham, from the terminal end)

In short, it’s clear that Brian has made an effort to reward the public for their $5 admission fee – even as he enjoys this layout at home. This also informed Brian’s wise decision to have three people help him exhibit Roweham. He wanted to make sure he could talk to visitors even as the layout continued to operate, and he wanted to make sure everybody had a chance to take a break from operating – a much better situation than one person, standing on his feet for six hours, trying to explain the layout to guests and keep the trains moving.

While it’s a modest design, with just four turnouts, Roweham is already finished to a level rarely seen at exhibition in these parts, and Brian continues to add details. New features this year include a cattle dock, a water tank, a brick workshop, some tractors, and more.

Roweham 2017

Roweham 2017

Meantime, Brian has taken a second pass at things, especially equipment, to give it a tasteful weathering job. All in all, Roweham will only get better each time it’s on display. Here are some more shots from the day…

Roweham 2017

Roweham 2017

Roweham 2017

Roweham 2017

Roweham 2017

Roweham 2017

Roweham 2017

Most modellers I meet are obsessed with quantity. They talk about the number of locomotives they have, or the number of freight cars, or the size of their layout. The first question often asked is, “How big is your layout?” – with emphasis on “big”. How different the hobby would be if we instead started with the question, “What story are you trying to tell?” – and then gauged how well the layout accomplishes that.

Brian’s layout tells a very clear story, and that’s why it succeeds so well.

Roweham 2017

Thanks again, Brian, for letting me be a part of your exhibition!

Cab ride to Port Rowan

I continue to experiment with my video camera from Replay XD, which rides nicely on a flat car.

Having had a successful test run on the S Scale Workshop layout over the weekend – with two videos shared to the Workshop blog – I’ve now also done a test-run on my Port Rowan layout:


(You may also view this directly on YouTube, where you may be able to enjoy it in larger formats)

This trip is looking into the sun, so everything is somewhat backlit. I will do an eastbound trip – with the sun at my back – when time permits.

I’m still learning about what this camera can do, but I’m enjoying the results so far…

Stafford’s remarkable layout

 photo StaffordSwainLayout-01_zpsgcuey8vn.jpg
(A remarkable influence on Canadian modelling. Click on the image to read more about Stafford and his layout)

John Longhurst, who writes an excellent blog about his adventures in the hobby, this week reminded me of just how influential Stafford Swain has been on the Canadian modelling scene. Click on John’s image of Stafford’s layout (above) to read his post.

My first encounter with Stafford’s work was in print: I remember seeing his layout featured on the cover of the January 1979 issue of Railroad Model Craftsman magazine, and being astonished by his HO scale rendition of the scenery of the Canadian Shield:

 photo RMC-1979-01_zpsbdfpiri9.jpg

I was equally impressed by how much “negative space” he’d incorporated into his layout. While the layout featured a yard with engine terminal and other more typical model railway scenes (all very well executed), a huge portion of the layout was devoted to a single track that twisted its way between rocky outcroppings, past trees, over fills, and across bridges.

At the time, I thought, “I’d probably fill that with another town, or a coal mine, or a coal mine and a power plant so I could do ‘loads in/empties out’ operations”. But I was much younger and measured a design’s success by how much track had been packed into the space.

These days, I realize that the sense of distance that Stafford created – the sense that the trains on his layout were actually going somewhere – is one of the themes I have been trying to portray on every layout I’ve built in the last 15-20 years. And I realize that Stafford’s layout is probably the first example of that sense of distance that I saw. Thanks for that, Stafford!

Stafford’s layout was dismantled a few years ago, but Stafford has had a huge influence on Canadian modelling – including my own – that goes well beyond his scenery work, or indeed his HO scale empire.

Rather than repeat that influence here, I encourage you to read John’s post – Stafford Swain’s CNR Whiteshell Subdivision Re-Visited.

(Thanks for the reminder, John!)

A visit from Jim and John

Earlier this week, my friend (and fellow host of The Model Railway Show) Jim Martin visited, along with a long-time friend of his, John Morris. It’s been a while since I’ve seen them – John lives in Manitoba and visits Jim regularly but it’s been a few years since we got together, and Jim’s been pretty busy with things that have prevented him from coming into the city.

We had a great couple of hours in the layout room. It was John’s first visit to Port Rowan in 1:64, so I gave him the quick tour. And it’s been a while since Jim saw the layout, so there was a lot of catching up to do.

 photo Jim-John-20150915-01_zpsdaotrzjs.jpg

We talked about many things – among them, my use of mock-ups as stand-ins for structures. I like mock-ups not only as place holders but also as a way to test my plans for a structure. Since I’m modelling a specific place and time, most of my structures are based on real building and it’s important to make sure I’ve properly captured proportions, roof angles, and so on. It’s far easier (and cheaper) to modify cardboard than it is to re-work a model in styrene and strip wood. And because I know that some of these mock-ups will stay on the layout for some time before I get around to building the structures that they represent, I feel it’s worthwhile to invest a little bit of coin and build them using good-quality artist’s board in appropriate colours. Some of the mock-ups on my layout have been in place now for about three years, and they still look good.

 photo Jim-John-20150915-02_zpsmqmlo2oh.jpg

Of course, we ran a train – although I did not haul out waybills and put the guys to work. John has built and painted many HO scale steam locomotives for Canadian prototypes – he’s well-known in the community for his excellent work – and I knew he’d enjoy seeing these larger models of tiny prototypes put through their paces.

The layout really came through for me too, with no derailments or stalling. Other than one or two missed couplings, it was a perfect session. We talked about that, too – and agreed that flawless operation is a goal worthy of pursuing. It’s also achievable when one focuses on a smaller, easier to manage layout like mine – and I think that any perceived trade-off in pursuing a simpler-is-better approach is more than made up for by the enjoyment of realistic and reliable operation.

(I remember causing a tempest in a teapot on a newsgroup one time by declaring that this was my goal. I was told “It can’t be done”, and “Real railroads have derailments too”, and other such excuses. But having experienced flawless operating sessions the On3 layout built by my friend Dave Burroughs I knew it could, in fact, be done – and I’m determined to achieve that in my own layout room.)

 photo Jim-John-20150915-03_zpsv00l2ffa.jpg

Smaller, simpler layouts also free up hobby time to pursue special projects that may require a significant investment in modelling time. An example is the “Someday Spreader” I wrote about previously on this blog:

 photo JordanA-HO-02_zpswres3tbi.jpg
(Click on the image to read about the “Someday Spreader”)

My visit from Jim and John occurred the evening before I stumbled across the model that inspired that post. I admire John’s work in brass and I realized, while talking with him, that the biggest hurdle to tackling such a project is convincing oneself that one can do it. I suspect that our conversation the night before tipped my hand to purchase the Jordan Spreader and commit myself to building one in 1:64. Thanks for that, John!

When my wife finished work, she joined us as we retired to The Caledonian – a terrific Scottish pub in my neighbourhood – to wind up the evening with more great conversation over good food, and a promise from Jim that he’d come for a visit more often. (John – you’re welcome too of course, whenever you’re in the area!)

Chance meeting with Brian and Dennis

I was pretty busy with work on Monday so Jack and Mocean did not get their morning walk until mid-day. Eventually, guilt set in and I took them for a quick spin around the neighbourhood. We have a short walk we do when I have things to do – basically, around a long block – because it only takes 15 minutes:

 photo Jack-Mocean-Walk-150824_zps1lwbunot.jpg
(Jack and Mocean: Judged by the tension on the leads, we’re making good time – which is not always the case…)

Timing is everything, however – and when we reached the half-way point I passed two guys who looked familiar but I couldn’t quite place them. (This happens when people are out of context: I remember seeing a woman at a neighbourhood party and having this same problem. I solved it by asking her and as we worked through our various possible connections we discovered we both have dogs: Problem solved! “Oh – you’re Obie’s mum!” But I digress…)

The two gentlemen were having the same problem – I looked familiar, but I was out of context.

Of course, the context is train-related: Specifically, the annual S Scale Social organized by Jim Martin – because that’s where I’ve met both Brian Walsh and Dennis Rowe.

Brian and Dennis were in the neighbourhood to visit a friend and were just heading back to their car when we met on the sidewalk. We got talking and since my place was just a block away, I invited them in to see the layout:

 photo Vist-Brian-Dennis_zpsqpmahq0m.jpg
(A flagman protects Charlotteville Street as Extra 80 West creeps through St. Williams)

Dennis makes some really nice trees – and had these samples on display at last year’s S Scale Social…

 photo Social-2014-06_zpsa388a745.jpg

… so we had a good chat about the ins and outs of building convincing trees in 1:64.

The visit wasn’t long – Brian and Dennis had to rescue their car before their parking expired, and I had to get back to work. But it was a lovely break in the day and I’m really glad we ran into each other.

Great to see you both – and I hope to see you at this year’s S Scale Social in a couple of months!